Stable decision
Agreed thresholds and one OK/NOK/Error logic instead of subjective judgement.
On-premises AI visual inspection
Automate manual quality inspection without replacing your entire production environment. AIVQC combines data, training, validation and local OK/NOK decisions in one controlled process.
Reuse existing hardware where it meets the requirements. Data can stay inside your plant. Start with one inspection.
Interface demonstration — not a reference validation result.
More complete than a smart camera.
Less complex than enterprise machine vision.
WHY AIVQC
An operator can see a defect. AIVQC helps turn that knowledge into a measurable, versioned process for every captured part.
We do not sell “just a model”. We combine imaging, data, validation, deployment and operational line support.
Agreed thresholds and one OK/NOK/Error logic instead of subjective judgement.
We do not assume the computer, camera or entire station must be replaced. We qualify the existing setup first.
Production images do not have to leave your infrastructure.
You know which model, recipe and configuration produced every result.
RETROFIT, NOT REVOLUTION
AIVQC qualifies the computer, camera and configuration for a specific process instead of requiring one closed hardware ecosystem.
HOW THE PLATFORM IS BUILT
Three specialised components prepare, publish and run an approved inspection.
TRAIN
Prepare data and verify inspection quality before release.
CONTROL
Publish approved versions only to selected stations.
INSPECT
Make local OK/NOK decisions and pass them to the process.
HOW AN INSPECTION GOES LIVE
A model is not the end of the project. Only an approved package, station qualification and unambiguous decision logic create a production solution.
Natural process variation and real OK and NOK examples.
Annotation, data versioning, training and result comparison.
Quality, errors and performance measured on an independent test.
The verified model goes only to selected stations.
History, difficult cases, a new version and safe rollback.
APPLICATIONS
A good image is essential for a good inspection. The best first application is a repeatable product, controlled position and a defect that can be shown clearly in an image.
Example process scenarios — not reference validation results.
Check assembly completeness and the presence of required components.
Detect reversed, displaced or incorrectly seated parts.
Identify moulding, geometry and product-edge defects.
Visually detect scratches, cracks and surface damage.
Verify the presence, orientation and legibility of markings.
Detect foreign objects, dirt and surface deviations.
DESIGNED FOR PRODUCTION
AIVQC Production keeps the latest verified package locally. Inspection can continue during a server or network interruption, while activation and rollback remain controlled.
EVIDENCE, NOT A PROMISE
We do not transfer a demonstration result to your process. We measure the solution on representative data and under target imaging conditions.
A reference validation result is not a guarantee for other products or process conditions.
AIVQC VS OTHER APPROACHES
This comparison shows the typical scope of each approach. Final capabilities depend on the specific supplier and project.
| Capability | Manual inspection | Smart camera | Custom project | AIVQC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automated OK/NOK decision | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI-based defect detection | — | partly | ✓ | ✓ |
| Existing hardware qualification | — | — | depends | ✓ |
| Controlled model lifecycle | — | — | depends | ✓ |
| Local operation inside the plant | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pilot before deployment | — | depends | depends | ✓ |
| Scaling to additional lines | — | depends | depends | ✓ |
AIVQC specialises in quality inspection: from data and validation to local execution and version control across additional lines.
AIVQC PILOT
A paid feasibility pilot reduces risk before investment in a production station. You receive a data-based result — including when the honest recommendation is NO-GO.
Pilot and production deployments are currently available in Poland only. Future markets have not yet been selected.
We define the product, defect, business value and imaging conditions.
We prepare representative OK/NOK samples and an independent test set.
We train up to three main iterations and select decision thresholds.
We measure quality, false accepts, false rejects, performance and decision time.
You receive a report and a GO, CONDITIONAL GO or NO-GO recommendation.
MANUFACTURING EXPERIENCE + SOFTWARE
AIVQC was created from practical experience in manufacturing, quality inspection, industrial maintenance and computer vision. The goal is not another AI demonstration, but a solution that can be qualified, maintained and improved under real plant conditions.
Dawid Oleśko · Founder, AIVQCFAQ
Every station and process is different. A pilot replaces assumptions with a real test.
No. The AIVQC architecture is designed for local operation, and image analysis runs at the AIVQC Production station.
Yes, if they pass qualification with the target camera, model, recipe, I/O and required cycle time. A processor or camera name alone does not guarantee the result.
We do not use one threshold for every project. Acceptance criteria are agreed before the pilot based on the risk and economics of the specific process.
We prepare a separate production deployment offer covering the licence, hardware qualification, configuration and agreed integration scope.
SEE. DETECT. IMPROVE.
Describe the product, defect and current inspection method. We will make an initial assessment of whether the application is suitable for a pilot.
oleskodawid@aivqc.com